Intent
versus Failure
Intellectual
versus Simpleton
Academia
versus Religion
The
Most Basic Decision
Christianity
versus All Other Religions
Elitism
versus Consensus
A Root
of ALL Evil
Intent versus
Failure
An object in motion will remain in
motion until acted upon by a greater force.
An object at rest will remain at rest until
acted upon by a greater force.
A project initiated with bad intent will ultimately
fail when action by a greater force with good intent overcomes it.
A project initiated with good intent will
succeed until any minute detail is overlooked.
Every minute detail is governed by Murphy's
law which is as consistent as gravity.
Good intent by itself, cannot overcome overlooked
bad details.
Bad intent will ultimately be judged by the
creator of "good," God.
When good intent is combined with minute pre
inspection of all details, especially that of aligning with "God's Will,"
the project will ultimately succeed, even if acted on and slowed by outside
forces.
But NO GREATER FORCE exists that is capable
of overcoming God's Will.
In rare situations, good intent will overcome
the greater force of bad minute details. This is called a miracle.
In other circumstances, bad intent will actually
accomplish some good. This is merely a masterful counter-move by
God to accomplish his greater will, which is always a more powerful force.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
Intellectual versus
Simpleton
The only difference between an intellectual
and a simpleton is the ability to store and process large amounts of data
and information. Neither has a monopoly on truth. Quantity
versus Quality must be challenged by each.
A Sony Playstation or Microsoft "X" Box that
is only loaded with one video game, will dazzle the viewer with amazing
graphics but is unable to answer the simple question of "what is 2 + 2"
without calculator software.
An old Commodore 64, Apple IIe, or Intel 286
loaded with simple calculator software can answer the question of 2 + 2
correctly every time.
Data storage and processing power are only
useful when the SOFTWARE is appropriate for the task. Given a simple
task like the comparison listed above, the slower machine can win, where
the faster machine loses big time.
Likewise in humans, a person's memory capacity,
wit, presentation and spontaneity are only of value when exercised properly.
Severely limited, handicapped people are still able to survive so long
as they are equipped with truthful knowledge. But one lie or mistake
can kill anyone.
An accurate, TRUTHful answer from a slower
computer or human is ultimately more beneficial than a WRONG answer from
a faster, or more attractive, slicker looking and sounding source.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
Academia versus
Religion
Academia places total emphasis
on compilation of data or information, which is best described as knowledge.
Religion stresses primarily truthful
analysis and application of any information, which is best described
as wisdom.
Intellectuals migrate to academia due to their
natural ability to store and process massive amounts of information.
Simpletons tend to migrate to religions because
in order for them to survive into adulthood, they had to apply every
neuron of information they could store accurately or be killed.
They could not waste valuable memory space storing alternative, fallible
viewpoints on matters, then sort through all of them to determine the best
or safest one before implementing an action.
A simpleton must remember only truthful information
and discard lies immediately. There is no room to store and remember
lies to contemplate later.
An intellectual can store huge numbers of lies
and misinformation to be evaluated at a later date. A simpleton does
not have that luxury.
To a simpleton, religion is necessary for survival.
It weeds out information as it comes in.
To an intellectual, religion is another topic
to analyze when they have time. They feel they need no filtering
device.
So it can be said that:
academics have little or no requirement
for integrity, just large amounts of information,
while religious people require truthful analysis
and application of ALL information,
and prefer minimal information to be discussed
due to their own natural limitations.
or in regards to information
Academia = quantity
Religion = quality
But to a BALANCED individual at ANY level
of intellectual capacity,
truthful analysis must control every bit of
knowledge obtained, stored and processed.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
The Most Basic Decision
Regardless of anyone's intellectual capacity, everyone must determine
just who created everything. Once determined, it should be obvious
that that creator has the group of standards or commands that one should
follow. Everyone and everything must answer to its creator.
The universe has extensive order and design and is impossible to
have this level of extensive, yet balanced order without an infinitely
intelligent designer.
Given this fact, the next challenge is to find out who offers the
best description of who "God - creator of everything" is. The answer
will not come from processing massive quantities of data, but comes from
processing only ACCURATE data. Therefore a simpleton can obtain the
correct answer as easily as an intellectual.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
Christianity versus
All Other Religions
When the question is asked: "How can
anyone know which religion is correct?" the answer must be obtained by
truthful analysis. Every salesman knows people may shop with knowledge,
but they buy on emotion. Different people have different emotional
"hot buttons." The most effective salesmen have compiled their own
private list of what ignites most people's emotions to his product.
Since one's eternity is at stake, it is best to ignore emotional slogans
given by anyone who can profit by your decision. But it is certainly
permissible to get emotional when you discover a true bargain when shopping
for anything.
A creator of the universe, by simple logic,
must have been around since the beginning of creation. Therefore
any religion that tries to explain the creator must have been around since
the beginning of mankind's history. For this reason, no recently
"invented" religions have any credibility to even consider. This
only leaves Hindus, Buddhists, Moslems and Judeo/Christianity. None
of the occultic/pagan religions of Egypt or other cultures have any credibility
because time has proven, they didn't work. All the cultures that
practiced them, disappeared or destroyed themselves with hideous blood
thirsty practices.
Of all the major religions in the world, only
Jesus Christ claimed to be God. He followed up that claim with miracles
witnessed by thousands.
Only Jesus Christ originated the statement:
"I am the way, the truth and the light. No
one comes unto the father but by Me."
Buddha never claimed to be God, the creator
of the universe.
Confucius never claimed to be God, the creator
of the universe.
Dahlia Llama never claimed to be God, the
creator of the universe.
Shirley Mac Laine does claim to be god but
has yet to accomplish one miracle.
Even Satan doesn't claim to have created the
universe, he only wants to steal control of it.
Did Mohammed claim to be God? No. He
just claimed to be a prophet.
Is Allah the same as the Christian God?
No.
But Judaism, Christianity and Moslems all
claim to be monotheistic, why aren't they the same God?
Mohammed was a member of a tribe that worshipped
many gods. This tribe felt the most powerful god of the group was
the moon god: Allah. Ask any Moslem why they have a crescent
moon on top of every mosque in the world. This is why.
Moslem tradition says Mohammed ascended into
heaven from the same location as the Dome of the Rock Mosque. But
history shows that at the time of Mohammed's death, that exact location
was occupied by a Catholic Church. Christian churches were taught by Mohammed
to be the unholy property of infidels. He would never enter one.
God chose the Israelites to store his Holy
scriptures and promised their messiah (eternal leader) would come to them
and the world through the blood line of David. Up to this point,
Christians agree with Orthodox Jews. But the Jewish religious leaders
overlooked numerous prophecies in Daniel, and Isaiah as to when and how
their messiah would arrive. When Christ, the messiah did arrive,
he was ignored and ultimately rejected and executed. Three days later
he was resurrected and seen by over 500 individuals. For whatever
reason, today's Jewish religion continues to deny what was witnessed by
hundreds following Christ's resurrection to full life again. Christ
said he went to prepare a place for his followers and that he would return
again to reign and rule on Earth for a thousand years before creating a
new Heaven and a new Earth.
Evolution is a fantasy that has only been taught
since Charles Darwin in the mid 1800's. Darwin never claimed to be
God. He did claim everything happened by accident over billions of
years. But his doctrine fails miserably in light of true science.
DNA is found to be a digital code, an extremely
powerful one. No digital code works without a language, authored
by intelligence. No amount of random digital jumbling ever creates
anything without first a language being authored to make the jumbled numbers
mean something.
Claims of an ancient universe assume the speed
of light to be constant. It is now found NOT to be constant.
It is slowing down.
No missing link has ever been discovered.
Every Darwinian icon from Piltdown man, Neanderthal, Nebraska man to Lucy
has been proven to be a total fraud. And "Encino man" was just a
plain bad Pauly Shore movie. Dinosaur bones don't always show up
in the right rock strata to support the old Earth claims of Darwinians.
Dinosaur fossil footprints are found alongside human footprints in both
Arizona and Texas. The word "dinosaur" was invented in the mid 1800's.
Prior to that, large reptiles were always called dragons. Virtually
all cultures around the world have legions about dragons.
But every claim in the Christian Bible does
agree with true science. Dr. Kent Hovind at http://www.drdino.com
offers more extensive documentation on this matter.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
Elitism versus
Consensus
Everyone who thinks they have unique
items or information, tends to lord it over others. This can create
snobbism or elitism. Religious groups have as much of this basic
(faulty) human nature as non religious.
When a neighbor claims to have a faster car,
you ignore the claim until you take him to a drag strip and blow him away
in your exhaust. But if his claim was correct, you get to breath exhaust
from his car.
Juvenile snobbism like that seldom hurts anyone.
But when religion comes into play, the rules change dramatically.
Intellectuals and simpletons act identically. All wisdom is discarded
and "King of the Hill" mentality takes over.
But the absolute most frightening issue here
is that ALL religious people think they have full control over life and
death. They can prove this claim with the doctrine taught
by the religion they follow.
Now, have I just discredited Christianity with
this statement? No. The KEY word in the previous sentence
was DOCTRINE. Anyone who follows ANY religion without
checking out the DOCTRINE being taught, goes beyond being a simpleton to
being that of a dangerous fool or total idiotic moron. Unfortunately
the world is full of people in ALL religions who fit this category.
They bought their religious belief on EMOTION. They never applied
any wisdom to making their decision.
Does Christianity promise eternal life?
Yes. What evidence is there to make that claim? Christ was
executed in front of hundreds of witnesses. He was seen again in
full life 3 days later, also by hundreds of witnesses.
Can Buddhists make that claim? No.
Can Hindus make that claim? No.
Can Moslems make that claim? No.
Can Jews make that claim? Messianic
ones can.
And we must look at how a religion is taught
to promote itself by its own doctrine.
Jews think they are the exclusive owners of
salvation by identity of their race and don't care to share it with others.
Hindus and Buddhists only share their "philosophies"
with anyone who asks. No compulsion to evangelize.
But here is the most frightening and greatest
problem of violence in the world today: the Moslem religion as taught
in the Koran tells followers: "to convert unbelievers (infidels) either
by word or SWORD." This religion TEACHES followers to KILL non-believers,
especially Christians and Jews. It goes on to make a (false) promise
of special rewards in their version of heaven if a follower kills an infidel.
No one is safe from this madness. NO Moslem has ever returned from
the dead.
But Christianity rests on the verses: "Come,
let us reason together" and "Go into the uttermost parts of the world,
preaching unto all creatures, making them disciples (students) of Christ."
Is any violence or harm even implied in these guidelines? Absolutely
not. Believers are even COMMANDED to "do unto others that which you
would have them do unto you."
So although many groups take an elitist approach,
claiming exclusivity on eternal salvation, only Christianity has any evidence
to support that claim, and support it in a NON-violent fashion per their
own doctrine.
But where misguided elitism inside the Moslem
religion creates a violent danger, the converse is mass apathy, expressed
in consensus. If everyone else is doing it, I'll just go along with
the flow and not make any waves.
History is littered with events where only
a few understood the current problem and were able to react or escape.
The Titanic, Nazi death camps, major battles of war and natural disasters
delivered a few survivors, but countless millions lost their lives, unable
to overcome the circumstances of the moment and unprepared for obtaining
their own safety. The massive populace refused to listen to the few
individuals warning of the pending doom.
Today's politicians choose to manipulate this
mass ignorance by using consensus on the populace while practicing social
elitism themselves. Leaning on the "everyone's doing it" approach
to promote their own agenda. Turning millions into human lemmings
to march into the sea, these sharks feed their own appetites at the expense
of everyone. The United Nations is the grand daddy of all promoters
of consensus while practicing an elitist ruling agenda on all who fall
for their phony bait.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
A Root of ALL Evil
Love of Money. The old
King James says it is "THE" root of all evil. Newer translations
read it as "A" root of all kinds of evil. Either way, money is most
often blamed when the older and newer translations both say it is the LOVE
of the stuff that feeds evil. Scripture does not condemn wealth or
even having money itself. Job was wealthy both before his calamities
and after. God never criticized Job's wealth at either time.
Solomon was GIVEN massive wealth by God. Solomon was only criticized
for accepting the INFLUENCE of non-believers. His wealth, or abundance
of silver and gold coins in his treasury was never criticized either.
Money allows discretionary actions. The
more one has, the less the person has to work for life's basic necessities.
When a person's wealth exceeds all their needs, a new danger enters.
The power of the money will enable its owner to control other people.
At this point, there has to be moral guidelines followed by the owner of
the money or pain, suffering and further disaster can be caused by the
spender paying little attention to where it is going.
When people with no moral conscience, acquire
massive amounts of money, the entire world is at risk. This is unfortunately
what has happened with the world's International Central Banking system.
Originally started as a clever business maneuver by the Red Shield (Rothchild)
family in Germany, it grew to control all the governments of the world
today.
Various secret societies invaded this banking
system in the 1700's simply because of the massive wealth and international
control of money that could be obtained. And when you research virtually
any of these secret societies: Masonic Lodge, Shriners, Knights Templar,
Rhodes Scholar, Illuminati, Thule, Skull and Bones, and many others, you
discover an ominous tie to the occult and Satan worship at the higher levels
of command. So as members climb higher and higher in these organizations,
they are not only acquiring more social power, but they are being progressively
influenced by satanic reasoning.
With all the world's money being controlled
by a group that is mentally or philosophically controlled by Satan, we
now see why the International Central Bankers have financed every war on
both sides since the French Revolution.
When this evil crowd united with money loving
politicians to give us first the Federal Reserve System to create a national
debt to the bankers, followed by the income tax system to pay the debt
back for infinity, a new monster was created. The tax-exempt foundation.
minor classifications were created to allow corporate funded tax exempt
groups to give money to any cause they wished, including political, but
to restrict any religious tax exempt from how they could spend their donations.
The result, filthy rich elitists who pay no
income tax.
Has the American Cancer Society cured cancer
for us with the billions of dollars they have received over the years?
No.
Has Green Peace, or Sierra Club spent any money
on technologies that really do provide a clean alternative to current fossil
fuel technology? No, they just want your money and political control
of more money.
Has Planned Parenthood taught responsible behavior
to young women and men? No. They make millions of dollars from
abortions.
This massive elitist money perpetuates the
"population control"
movement's agenda which has been traced to the creation of AIDS, e-bola,
worldwide promotion of abortion and prevention of the distribution of disease
preventative measures. The Hewlett Packard foundation was reported
by the Wall Street Journal of giving a million dollars a day to promote
world population control. The Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation,
Ford and Carnegie Foundations also have massive amounts of blood on their
hands from misapplied trillions of dollars.
You now see the structure of what is termed
"The New World Order." They already HAVE control of all the money
in the world. They already HAVE control of most of the politicians
in the world. And through apathy and consensus promoted by this group,
the world populace goes along with everything they preach.
Obtaining money for simple survival, astute
savings, and advancement become the greatest challenge to a righteous person
who wants to do good and get along with his neighbor. The task seems
insurmountable when virtually all the money in the word is being spent
for evil purposes. How can any honest business man get ahead?
On this note, our discussion begins.
I hope you can give me some more answers. This is a tough one.
Bad Christian doctrine, often labeled "name it and claim it" gives the
impression that God is a genie you only need to petition for "all your
needs." A Greek scholar told me that Phillipians 4:19 is best translated:
"And my God shall fulfill all you need." (singular, not plural)
That would mean God is more concerned about your overall fulfillment of
lifelong purpose than he is any specific temporary need. But we do
know from history that he does occasionally intervene with provision, but
seldom in a predictable fashion. Apparently God dislikes complacency
among his followers. Christ said "...you will have tribulation."
His followers were told early on they would be just as mistreated as Christ
himself. Not a pleasant thought, until you realize, these tribulations
are only temporary. Christ also told his followers not to fear those
who can only harm the body, but to truly fear (respect) the only one who
has the power to condemn both body and soul to Hell for eternity.
Miracles occur, but are not daily functions
with most believers. We can only continue to petition God to better
understand his will in our lives that we can show obedience by carrying
out his will by our actions. We are not told to be judges, condemning
sinners to Hell, that is His job in the Great White Throne judgment, but
we are to be living examples in all our deeds of how He would act in any
given situation.
Return to
topics - Absolute Basic Precepts
Proceed to Advanced
Concepts
|